Before your module task, one more thing that applies to every piece of content this module covers.
AI-generated content, however well prompted, requires your editorial eye before it goes anywhere near a client. This is not a caveat or a warning. It is a description of how the division of labour works.
AI drafts. You judge. That principle from Module 1 is never more important than in client-facing content, because your professional reputation sits in every communication you send. The tool can produce something that is in the right register, reflects the client detail you provided, and reads well on first pass. It can also miss something that only you would catch: a reference that does not quite land given the relationship history, a tone that is slightly off for where this client is in their decision-making, a piece of information that is technically correct but not appropriate to include at this stage.
Your editorial review is not an obstacle to efficiency. It is the step that makes the output genuinely yours. The time it takes is a fraction of the time you would have spent producing the draft. And the quality of attention you bring to reviewing something is higher than the quality of attention you bring to producing it from nothing, because reviewing is a cleaner cognitive task than composing.
Draft with AI. Judge with your expertise. That is the workflow.
